The Blair Witch Project (1999)Wicked Witch of the Web…

Can it really be already ten years since writer-directors Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sánchez’s horror revolution, The Blair Witch Project (1999), took the world and Web by storm?

In a promotional gimmick worthy of the late, great William Castle, young cineastes Myrick and Sánchez, who could see exactly how big the internet was going to get, decided to sell their grim ‘tale-to- be-told-round-the-camp-fire’ for real – the pitch, which was among the very first examples of ‘viral marketing’, and which was communicated via ‘for real’ news stories etc on the fledgling internet, was that a film made by three young student filmmakers (Heather Donahue, Joshua ‘Josh’ Leonard and Michael Williams, who all ‘play’ themselves) had been found a year after they had disappeared in the woods near the town of Burkittesville (formerly Blair), Maryland.

The teenagers had been filming, for a school project, an account of the true story behind a legend – the locals (including a marvellously off-kilter Patricia DeCou as ‘Mary Brown’) tell them about the witch myths, including the story of a hermit named Rustin Parr who kidnapped seven children and took them to his house in the woods from 1940 to 1941. Parr brought the children into his basement in pairs, killing one while the other stood in the corner (‘I couldn’t stand their eyes on me’) before turning on the kid in the corner. Par eventually handed himself into the police, (‘I’m finally finished’) saying that the spirit of a woman killed as a witch in the 18th century, Elly Kedward (the one still believed to haunt the forests), had forced him to murder the seven children. Ill-advisedley, the school chums, a la Scooby Doo, decide to investigate the woods – and it is their resulting ‘discovered’ film that we watch…

Rarely, if ever, have I seen a film for the first time in a cinema in which the atmosphere before, during and after was so electric – of course, no other medium but fear better suits how Blair Witch was marketed, but it’s still a rare treat to see a full-house audience, to a man, discussing a movie so animatedly afterwards.

In addition, it’s one of those fright films that actually supports the (irritatingly oft-cited) notion that ‘the unseen is always more scary’ – there is absolutely nothing that is overtly horrific from a visual perspective, but what there is in spades (and check out the image used to illustrate this review by way of example, which was the last ‘scene’ in the film) is superb, nerve-jangling suggestion of something far, far worse than you could possibly imagine.

Led by Heather Donahue (whose excellent, terrified, tearful (and much-parodied) ‘I was so naive’ soliloqy is perhaps the movie’s high point), the young cast do very good job of being themselves on purpose, and the film as a whole emerges as a consumately constructed journey into darkness.

And, yes, I know, I know, why didn’t anyone take a mobile phone? Grrrr. Some people shouldn’t be allowed to watch films…

Whatever – check out the still-excellent Blair Witch website for further updates…but don’t bother with Blair Witch 2: Book of Shadows (2000), Joe Berlinger’s ambitious but ultimately pointless effort to get all ‘meta’ with the concept.

86 mins.

5 Responses to “The Blair Witch Project (1999)”

  • Sorry, James. This was a big yawn-fest from beginning to end. It was as scary as High School Musical (2006) (in fact, HSM is a lot more scary, in many different ways). As an exercise in hype over substance, it was legendary. As a stand-alone piece of film-making, it was almost competent. Scary? Not even remotely. I watched it on my laptop many years ago. People will say “oh, you should have seen it at the cinema” – why? So I can be bored *and* annoyed at having wasted money to watch it?

    Hey! Gosh! There was apparently no script most of the time! Really? Well, blow me down. At least there’s a reason why the dialogue sucks so fiercely. Name one genuinely, goosebumps-down-the-spine moment and I’ll sit corrected. With all the fuss and hype, I often wonder if the DVD-hire shop gave me Abbot and Costello meet Frankenstein (1948) in the wrong box. If there was a rating system, I’d have to give it somewhere around 0.5 out of 100, just for the producers having the front to release it on the gullible public.

    Did I like it? Why, no I didn’t.

  • Hello, Colin. :-)

    Now, I can’t really respond in a “well, you SHOULD have been scared” fashion, can I, any more than I could tell you what you should and should not laugh at?

    Yet another reason, you see, why people are right when they say that horror and comedy (aside from being the two most difficult genres to do right) are very closely linked, namely it stops being funny and it starts being horror when it stops being someone else and it starts being you.

    For myself, I watched Blair Witch again recently, also on a lap-top and, although I am obviously by now aware of the (really very clever, in my opinion) games it plays with viewers, I have to say that it still does it for me. Unlike yourself, I truly didn’t find the script or chacterizations irritating and, as I stated in my review, the key set pieces (Heather’s tearful and terrified speech to camera, the ending) are still to my mind extraordinary.

    A pity I can’t convince you to like this one, but I obviously respect your stance. Fair enough? ;-)

  • Chris:

    I took this one in to the laboratory and it turns out that scientifically speaking you’re both wrong.

    According to my data we can be 97.6 per cent certain that TBWP is neither brilliant nor guff.

    It does have scares – finding the wierd rocks outside their tents on the first morning. Josh going missing. Heather finding a tooth, etc.

    But some of the improv is a bit irritating.

    In conclusion, TBWP is a fairly effective horror movie though further research might be required to demonstrate the robustness of my results.

    It was also a positive cultural event in so far as cheaply made but successful movies give aspiring filmmakers hope and sock it to the Hollywood man, man.

    On another note, a new horror movie is being released here called The Orphan (2009). Its tagline goes: ‘You’ll never guess her secret’.

    Perhaps Picturenose should run a competition to test this unfathomable mystery and give an ‘He’s Dead, Too!’ award to the winner? ;-)

    My guess is that the orphan killed her own parents.

  • James:

    Marvellous suggestion, young Chris. However, surely for horror these days, the ‘Scariest Moment Involving An Old Woman Gumming A Stupid Annoying American’ award would be more appropriate? I am joking, of course…;-)

    Concerning your own serious points, however, you might be right concerning TBWP – I was probably getting carried away with the ten-year anniversary, happy memories, et al, but I do still think it’s a very effective horror.

  • Chris:

    Hi Jimbo,

    Re:”Marvellous suggestion, young Chris. However, surely for horror these days, the ‘Scariest Moment Involving An Old Woman Gumming A Stupid Annoying American’ award would be more appropriate? I am joking, of course…;-)”

    I wouldn’t want to comment. It might make you a bit tetchy? ;-)

Leave a Reply

450+ Movie reviews and counting.
Recent Comments
  • Colin: Mike: the Matrix was utter toss. Don’t go there. Anyhow, I’m right with you on Aliens –...
  • Colin: James: Why not do ten more and see if you can avoid putting the god-awful travesty that is Independence Day in...
  • CD: The Day the Earth Stood Still (it’s about an alien who is Jesus…but better than ET) Soylent Green...
  • James: Hello Chris, and welcome to Picturenose! :-) Many thanks for your comment – I thought, in fact, that...
  • James: Colin, good points, both on Westworld (which should really have been included, I know, I know) and otters. :-)
Categories